Rengasamy R v. The Inspector General Of Registration
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.11433 of 2026 R.Rengasamy ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.
2.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Peraiyur, Madurai District.
... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certioarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent in impugned Refusal Check Slip in Refusal No.RFL/Peraiyur/6/2026, dated 07.04.2026 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the second respondent to register the sale deed submitted by the petitioner in Temporary Registration No.TP/264475434/2026 dated 07.04.2026 for the landed property comprised in Survey No.20/6 for an extent of 0.19.50 Ares equivalent to 24.0825 cents situated at Vaiyur Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District, within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.K.Shobika Page No. 1 of 4
For Respondents : Mr.P.Rajagopalan Government Standing Counsel
ORDER
This Writ Petition challenges the impugned refusal check slip, whereby the document presented by the petitioner for registration was refused on the ground that the original parent document, referred to and relied upon in the instrument presented for registration, had not been produced and that no non-traceable certificate had been furnished.
2. The said refusal is founded upon Section 34-C of the Registration Act, 1908, as inserted by Tamil Nadu Act 1 of 2026.
3. By order dated 23.06.2026 in M/s.Dugars, represented by its Partner v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others [W.P.(MD) No.7415 of 2026 etc., batch], Section 34-C of the Registration Act, 1908, has already been declared unconstitutional.
4. In view of the aforesaid judgment, the legal position that prevailed prior to the insertion of Section 34-C would govern the present case. Consequently, the production of a certified copy of the parent Page No. 2 of 4
document would suffice for the purpose of registration and the registering authority is bound to consider the same in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms: (i) The impugned refusal check slip is set aside. The petitioner is permitted to re-present the document for registration along with a certified copy of the parent document. Upon such presentation, the registering authority shall process the document and complete the registration, if it is otherwise in order and if there exists no other legal impediment. (ii) There shall be no order as to costs.
NCC : No 25.06.2026 smn2 To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.
2.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Peraiyur, Madurai District.
Page No. 3 of 4
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J.
smn2 25.06.2026 Page No. 4 of 4