Madras High CourtWP(MD)/11498/2017partly allowed

S.Arumugam, v. The Commissioner Of Police

2017-06-21Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.11498 of 2017 S.Arumugam .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Edamalaipatti Pudur Police Station, Tiruchirappalli Corporation, Tiruchirappalli District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 17.06.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same consequently direct the second respondent to grant permission to conduct the Adal Padal Show to be held on 26.06.2017 at 7.00 pm to celebrate the festival of Arulmigu Sri Bagavathi Amman, Aadhali Karuppu, Madurai Veeran Temple situated at Periyakothamangalam, Tiruchirappalli Corporation, Tiruchirappalli District and further provide adequate police protection to the festival.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj For Respondents : Mr.K.Guru, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the impugned order dated 17.06.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus.

2.Mr.K.Guru, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation for the purpose mentioned therein, but the second

respondent has rejected the same by way of passing the impugned order dated 17.06.2017, wherein it has been simply stated that due to law and order problem, permission cannot be granted. The reason assigned by the second respondent cannot be accepted and therefore this Court is inclined to pass the following order. 4.In fine, this Writ Petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 17.06.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders on merits within a period of two days.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Edamalaipatti Pudur Police Station, Tiruchirappalli Corporation, Tiruchirappalli District.

+1cc to Mr.P.R.Prithviraj,Advocate,SR.61257 +1cc to M/S.Special Government Pleader,SR.61629 ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.11498 of 2017 21.06.2017 PS KK/SV MMS/22.06.2017/SAR2-2P-5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/