← Library
Madras High Court/7720/2026granted

V. Bala Murugan v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Usilampatti Taluk

2026-04-21Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21.04.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 7720 of 2026 1.V.Bala Murugan 2.V.Sivakami ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Taluk Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.64 of 2026)

...Respondents/Complainant

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Rajamohan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 126 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 133, 351(2) of BNS, 1/5

2023 and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.64 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner and the defacto complainant are husband and wife. Due to the matrimonial dispute, the petitioners harassed the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are in no way connected in the above said incident. They have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Due to matrimonial dispute, the defacto complainant lodged this false case against the petitioners. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submits that the offences are grave in nature. Due to matrimonial dispute, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant. The injured in this case has been discharged from the hospital. There is no previous case against the petitioners. Investigation is still pending. He opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the 2/5

petitioners.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners, that there is matrimonial dispute between the parties, considering the relationship between the parties, that there is no previous case against the petitioners, injured was discharged from the hospital, and also considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police at 10.30 a.m., on every Saturday, for a period of four weeks, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar 3/5

nature.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

(P D B J) 21.04.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti.

2.The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Taluk Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P. DHANABAL, J.

TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 7720 of 2026 Date : 21.04.2026 5/5