← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/11673/2017partly allowed

Muthuputhiyavan, v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2017-06-23Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.11673 of 2017 Muthuputhiyavan .. Petitioner Vs.

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pavoorchatram Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

.. Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 12.06.2017 and quash the same as illegal, consequently, direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to perform Aadal padal program 29.07.2017 from 09.00 pm onwards during the temple festival of Arulmighu Kottai Madasamy Temple, Thippanampatti Village, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondent : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the impugned order dated 12.06.2017 passed by the respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus. 2.Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents. 3.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation for the purpose mentioned therein, but the respondent has rejected the same by way of passing the impugned order dated 12.06.2017, wherein it has been simply stated that due to law and order problem, permission cannot be granted. The reason assigned by the respondent cannot be accepted and therefore this Court is inclined to pass the following order. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.In fine, this Writ Petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 12.06.2017 passed by the respondent is quashed. The respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders on merits within a period of two days. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(ADII) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pavoorchatram Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

Ps RL/2C/2P/SV/MMS/SAR3/29/6/2017 ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.11673 of 2017 23.06.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/