← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18098/2018disposed of

Allidevi, v. The Election Commissioner,

2018-08-20Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :20.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P(MD)Nos.18098 and 18099 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15997 and 15998 of 2018 W.P.(MD)No.18098 of 2018 Allidevi .. Petitioner Vs.

MD.Spl.85, Melasindhalaichery Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, .. Respondents PRAYER:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the third respondent from conducting the election to the fourth respondent society, for the period of 2018-2023, without following the election scheme as per the notice issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.321/2018/KuThe 1(2), dated 09.08.2018. W.P.(MD)No.18099 of 2018 Mariappan .. Petitioner

Vs.

Tu3-Thevaram Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Thevaram, .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the third respondent from conducting the election to the fourth respondent society, for the period of 2018-2023, without following the election scheme as per the notice issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.321/2018/KuThe 1(2), dated 09.08.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suriyanarayanan in both cases For Respondents : Mr.K.Chellapandian in both cases Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian Special Government Pleader *** COMMON ORDER [Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] These writ petitions have been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the third respondent from conducting the election to the fourth respondent society, for the period of 20182023, without following the election scheme as per the notice issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.321/2018/KuThe 1(2), dated 09.08.2018.

2.By consent of both sides, the writ petitions are taken up for final disposal.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that there are two objections raised i.e 1)Inclusion of dead members 2) With respect to the improper verification of voters by permitting them without any identification.

4.The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents would submit that in view of the law and order problem, election was not held and thereafter, the issue was referred to the Election Commission.

5.Under the Rules, it is to the Election Committee to take a call. Discretion of the election committee would also include the rest of the election will be conducted either afresh or to continue where it was left. In such view of the matter, we direct the first respondent to pass appropriate orders within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is also at liberty to make a representation to the first respondent, with reference to the grievance expressed before this Court. Needless to state that the first respondent shall consider the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner also, while taking a decision as indicated above.

6.With the aforesaid directions, these writ petitions are disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-III) To

MD.Spl.85, Melasindhalaichery Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society,

5. The Secretary, Tu3-Thevaram Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Thevaram, + 1 CC TO Mr.R.SURIYANARAYANAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 79468 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 79704 VS TE/JM/SV/SAR-3 : 12/09/2018 : 4P/8C ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)Nos.18098 and 18099 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15997 and 15998 of 2018 20.08.2018