← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP(MD)/7450/2023ordered

Karthick v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-05-18Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of May Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL MP(MD) No.7450 of 2023 in CRL RC(MD)No.521 of 2023 1 KARTHICK ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.4 2 KUTTAIKANNAN ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.5 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KENNIKKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the execution of the sentence passed in C.A No.22/2021, dated 30.03.2023 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Ramanathapuram confirming the judgement in SC No.128/2015, dated 07.10.2021, on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram and enlarge the petitioners on bail pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Petition.

Prayer in CRL RC(MD). 521/ 2023 :

To Call for Record and set aside the Judgement in C.A No.22 of 2021 dated 30.03.2023 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Ramanathapuram Confirming the judgement in SC No.128/2015 dated 07.10.2021 on the file of the Chief JM, Ramanathapuram and acquit the petitioners from all the charges.

Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.SURESH KANNAN.C, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.M.SAKTHI KUMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent while admitting the CRL RC., the Court made the following order:- The above petition has been filed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioners/accused 4 and 5 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Assistant Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, in S.C.No.128 of 2015, dated 07.10.2021, which was confirmed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, in C.A.No.22 of 2021, dated 30.03.2023, till the disposal of this criminal revision.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to money dispute, the petitioners/accused 4 and 5 along with the other accused had attacked the defacto complainant's son Maheshwaran by using deadly weapons and caused grievous injuries to him and on the basis of the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, FIR came to be registered in Crime No.4 of 2012.

3. The respondent police, after completing the investigation, has filed the final report and the case was taken on file in P.R.C.No.8 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram. Subsequently, the case was committed to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram and the case was taken on file in S.C.No.128 of 2015.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been convicted by the trial Court for the alleged offence under Section 307 IPC and sentenced them to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each, in default, to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment.

5. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, the petitioners have filed an appeal in C.A.No.22 of 2021 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram. The learned Sessions Judge confirmed the conviction and sentence and dismissed the appeal. Being dissatisfied with the said conviction and sentence, the petitioners have preferred the present Criminal Revision along with the instant miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would further submit that there are several infirmities in the prosecution case and further there are contradictions in material particulars between the evidence of the prosecution witnesses. He would further submit that the petitioners have already paid the fine amount.

7. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that there are enough materials available on record against the petitioners and hence, he strongly opposed to grant suspension of sentence.

8. This Court has carefully considered the rival contentions putforth by either side and also perused the materials available on record.

9. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners pointed out that certain infirmities and inconsistencies in this case and also certain contradictions in material particulars. The fact remains that there are arguable points involved in this criminal revision and further the criminal revision is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and as such, this Court is

of the considered view that the petitioners herein are entitled to the relief of grant of suspension of sentence.

10. Accordingly, the relief of suspension of sentence is granted to the petitioners on the following conditions:- (i) The petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram;

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; and (iii) The petitioners shall appear before the said Court on all working days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders and if they are not able to appear before the trial Court on any day, they shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 of Cr.P.C and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of their absence, as directed by the trial Court. sd/- 18/05/2023 / TRUE COPY / /05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

CSM TO 1 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KENNIKKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.SURESH KANNAN.C, Advocate ( SR-7619[I] dated 19/05/2023 )

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.7450 of 2023 in CRL RC(MD)No.521 of 2023 Date :18/05/2023 (1/3) SS/CG/SAR /24/05/2023/3P/6C