← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9012/2023ordered

Dinesh v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-05-18Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/05/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI Dinesh

...Petitioner/Accused NO.1

Vs.

State rep., by The Inspector of Police, Manapparai Police Station, Trichy District.

In Crime No.206 of 2022.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bhagavathsingh, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.SS.Madhavan, Government Advocate (Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.206 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 324 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.206 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was previous enmity between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioner along with other accused abused the defacto complainant and also attacked him. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

1/3

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State would submit that due to previous enmity between the parties, the petitioner along with other accused persons attacked the defacto complainant.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the dispute between the parties, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police on every Wednesday at 10.30 am for a period of eight weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. (c)the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused / petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 18/05/2023 / TRUE COPY / /05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

DAS TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI.

2 DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAPPARAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.G.BHAGAVATHSINGH, Advocate (SR-7497[I] dated 18/05/2023

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9012 of 2023 Date :18/05/2023 PKP/CG/SAR- /23.05.2023/ 3P/6C 3/3