← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12478/2017disposed of

G.Lawrence, v. The Government Of Tamilnadu,

2017-07-12Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.12478 of 2017 G.Lawrence ... Petitioner -vs1.

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Environment and Forests Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.

The District Collector-cum-Chairman of District Forest Committee, Office of the District Collectorate, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent no.2 to sanction the purchase of properties in Old Survey No.2682/2 in Re-survey No.614/1 to an extent of 02 acres 48 cents situated at Dherisanamcope Village, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District and the properties in Old Survey Nos.2902, 2905, 2906, 2908, 2909, 2910 and 2911/1 & 2 in Re-Survey No.773/1 to an extent of 17 acres 30 cents situated at Azhgiapandiapuram Village, Tovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District within the time frame stipulated. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah Govt. Advocate *****

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent no.2 to sanction the purchase of properties in Old Survey No.2682/2 in Re-survey No.614/1 to an extent of 02 acres 48 cents situated at Dherisanamcope Village, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District and the properties in Old Survey Nos.2902, 2905, 2906, 2908, 2909, 2910 and 2911/1 & 2 in Re-Survey No.773/1 to an extent of 17 acres 30 cents situated at Azhgiapandiapuram Village, Tovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

2. The petitioner would among other things aver that he has purchased the above mentioned property for valuable consideration vide document No.1081 dated 19.06.2006. The said land is covered under the Tamil Nadu Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949. It is seen that as per Section 3(1)(a) of the Act, no owner of any private forest shall, without the previous sanction of the Committee sell, mortgage, lease or otherwise alienate the whole or

any portion of the forest. Therefore, the petitioner applied for getting permission for the purchase of the property, along with all necessary documents.

3. The petitioner would further aver that though the petitioner did not obtain permission for purchase, now the gazette notification dated 03.08.2015 shows that Section 4-A is inserted in Tamil Nadu Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949 and the said provision reads as follows:

"After Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949, the following section shall be inserted, namely:

4-A. Sanction to purchaser - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-Section (1) of Section 3, the purchaser of the whole or any portion of the forest, which has been sold by the owner of such forest without the previous sanction of the committee under clause(a) of sub-section(1) of Section 3, may apply to the committee for sanction to retain the whole or any portion of the forest, within such time as may be prescribed. (2)The committee may, by order, accord the sanction for the whole or any portion of the forest specified in the application, subject to such conditions as it may deem fit."

4. Therefore, the petitioner made an application to the Committee/R2 on 17.06.2017 for sanction of purchase of the above property in his name and the same is pending without any consideration. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition with the above said prayer.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, in support of his submission, relies upon the judgment of this Court in Kanyakumari District Planters Association, Ramavaramapuram, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District rep. By its Secretary and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others reported in (2016) 2 MLJ 513. Relevant portions of the said judgment reads as follows: "45. In the background of what we have observed, the Writ Court was fully justified in observing that the committee will decide which land is to be declared as 'forest for the purpose of the Act and if any tree is to be cut or remove, application has to be made before the authority and permission would be granted, if application is in order.

The Act also provides for an appellate remedy and the Government taking into consideration the representation of the rubber plantation owners, has issued G.O.Ms.No.512, dated 21.04.1984, by which permission can be granted by the District Forest Officer himself for felling matured rubber trees without reference to the District Committee and those applications are said to be disposed of, within a short time and none of the plantation owners have experienced any difficulties in this regard. Therefore, the Writ Court was right in holding that the contention that there has been violation of principles of natural justice is unacceptable.

46. Furthermore, by virtue of the recent amendment by Act 8 of 2015, even the subsequent purchasers are entitled to get their

transactions validated by submitting application to the Committee in terms of the newly inserted Section 4A and the Government is stated to have advised the District Committee to process such application within 60 days."

6. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that as per Section 4-A of the Tamil Nadu Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949, the petitioner can apply only for 'Sanction' not for 'purchase' and therefore, if the petitioner files necessary application with all necessary documents, the same would be considered by the second respondent within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.

7. In view of the above submission and following the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case, cited supra, this Court, without adverting to the merits of the case, directs the petitioner to make a fresh application before the second respondent in terms of the Amended Act for 'sanction' of his property, which has been purchased by him from his vendor and on receipt of such application, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such application, by giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned including the vendor, who sold the property to the petitioner. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

Sd /- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(PROTOCOL) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To:

1.

The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Environment and Forests Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.

The District Collector-cum-Chairman of District Forest Committee, Office of the District Collectorate, Kanyakumari District.

+1 CC TO MR.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, ADVOCATE,SR NO.65051 +1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR NO.65253 ar/rm MAS/SV/SAR4:19.07.2017:3P-5C W.P.(MD)No.12478 of 2017 12.07.2017