Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18233/2018dismissed

G.Seline Pushpa Rani, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2018-08-21Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.08.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.18233 of 2018 G.Seline Pushpa Rani .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Fort St.George, Chennai- 600 009.

2. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

3. The Director of School Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

4. The Joint Director of School Education(vocational), Office of the Director of School Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

5. The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Thuckalay Post - 629 175, Kanyakumari District.

6. The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Officer, Thuckalay Post - 629 175, Kanyakumari District.

7. The Accountant General, Office of the Accountant General(A&E), Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

.. Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction the retirement and pensionary benefits to the Petitioner by fixing the Grade Pay as Rs.5,400/- within the

time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents :

Mrs.S.Srimathy 1 to 6 Special Govt.Pleader For Respondent-7 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed,for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction the retirement and pensionary benefits to the Petitioner by fixing the Grade Pay as Rs.5,400/- within the time stipulated by this Court. 2.Mrs.S.Srimathy, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 6 and Mr.P.Gunasekaran, learned counsel takes notice for Respondent No.7. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3.The Writ Petition itself is not maintainable as for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, the Petitioner should have demanded the authorities concerned, to redress his grievances. But in the present case, the Petitioner has not at all submitted any representation to the authorities.

4.In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. The dismissal of the Writ Petition will not preclude the Petitioner from making a representation to the authorities concerned. If such representation is submitted, it is for the authorities concerned to consider the same taking note of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)Nos. 2654,2924 and 2663 of 2014 and W.P(MD)Nos.15980 and 17197 of 2018, dated 19.3.2018, if the same is applicable to the Petitioner. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-IV) To:

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai- 600 009.

2. The Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.