← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9894/2019dismissed

Sagayamary v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-07-15Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9894 of 2019 Sagayamary ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State represented through The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Dindigul District Dindigul 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Prohibition Enforcement Wing (PEW) Palani, Dindigul District 3.Radhika Inspector of Police Prohibitional Enforcement Wing (PEW) Palani, Dindigul District 4.Sakthivel Head Constable Sempatti Police Station Sempatti Dindigul District

...Respondents

Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent no.3 not to harass the petitioner and her family members in the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ranjith For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the third respondent not to harass the petitioner and her family members under the guise of enquiry.

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that the third respondent police namely, the Inspector of Police, Prohibitional Enforcement Wing (PEW), Palani has trespassed into the petitioner's house and also harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. Hence, the present Criminal Original Petition has been filed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner's husband namely one David was an accused in Prohibition cases. During the course of investigation, a search was conducting by the respondent police in the petitioner's house and the third respondent police is not harassing the petitioner. That apart, now the third respondent was transferred to some other Police Station.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the respondent is only conducting a search during an investigation and now the third respondent was also transferred to some other Police Station, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District Dindigul.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing (PEW), Palani, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Prohibitional Enforcement Wing (PEW), Palani, Dindigul District.

4. The Head Constable, Sempatti Police Station, Sempatti, Dindigul District.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.N.RANJITH, Advocate SR-75312.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9894 of 2019 15.07.2019 CS(29.07.2019) 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/