← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14845/2018allowed

Ganesan v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-08-23Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.[MD].No.14845 of 2018 1.Ganesan 2.Manimuthu 3.Mani 4.Ramachandran 5.Muthu 6.Stalin 7.Nagaraj 8.Vignesh 9.Lenin 10.Senthil 11.Jeeva 12.Ramu : Petitioners/Accused 1 to 12 Vs.

1. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, in Crime No.437 of 2010.

:Respondent/Complainant 2.Pandi : Respondent/ Defacto complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to pass an order to quash the proceedings in Crime No.437 of 2010 (on the file of the respondent Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District) dated 02.09.2010.

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Selvam For R-1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate[Crl. side] For R-2 : Mr.K.Marimuthu

ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.437 of 2010 on the file of the first respondent, for an alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 427, 324, 506(ii) IPC.

2. The case is still in the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.

3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The parties were https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

also present before the Court and they were identified by Mr.Mahandran, SI of Police and they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card which are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the proceedings in Crime No.437 of 2010.

5. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.437 of 2010, on the file of the first respondent, is quashed and the terms of Joint Compromise Memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Each of the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.250/- as costs, to the credit of the Chief Justice Relief Fund (payable in Accounts Section of the High Court Registry, Madurai Bench), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III) Encl: Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To

1. The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Copy to The Section Officer, Accounts Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.T.Selvam, Advocate Sr.No.15990 GNS VB/SKN/SAR3/24.09.2018/2P/5C Crl.O.P.[MD].No.14845 of 2018 23.08.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/