Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9068/2023dismissed

Nilofar Babar Ali v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-05-18Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.9068 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/05/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP(MD). No.9068 of 2023 Nilofar Babar Ali

...Petitioner/Accused No.2

Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Trichy City.

(Crime No.406 of 2023).

...Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karunanithi,Advocate For Respondent : Mr.SS.Madhavan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.406 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 406, 417, 420, 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.406 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused running chit fund and collected a sum of Rs.36,01,275/- from several persons and they failed to return the same. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and a false case has been foisted against https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.9068 of 2023 him. He would further submit that due to money transaction between the defacto complainant and the first accused, the petitioner has falsely implicated in this case, the first accused is none other than the father of the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing on behalf of the respondent police would submit that the petitioner along with the other accused running chit fund company and collected a sum of Rs.36,01,275/- from several persons and they failed to return the same. Hence, he strongly objected to release the petitioner on bail.

5. Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the amount involved in this case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition Stands dismissed. sd/- 18/05/2023 / TRUE COPY / /05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

SBN TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AIRPORT POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9068 of 2023 Date :18/05/2023 PKP/BUC/SAR- /31.05.2023/ 2P/3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2