← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18358/2018disposed of

M.Hariramu, S/O.Muniyandi, v. The District Collector,

2018-08-23Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P.[MD].No.18358 of 2018 M.Hariramu : Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The District Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

4.The Tahsildar, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District.

5.The Village Administrative Officer, Sayanapuram Group, Office at Puliyur, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District.

6.M.Kasimuniyandi : Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the representation dated 04.06.2018 with respect to cancel the illegal natham patta getting intusual and for consequential orders.

For petitioner : Mr.K.Suresh For respondents1 to 5 : Mr.N.Shanmugaselvam Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] The sum and substance of the grievance of the petitioner is that a public pathway is under occupation of the respondent No.6, whose case was considered wrongly. On receipt of the complaint of the petitioner, the second respondent has sent a communication dated 29.06.2018 to the third respondent. As no further action is forthcoming, the present Writ Petition has been filed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. We have perused the documents filed by the petitioner. The sixth respondent seems to have filed a suit claiming title over the property in question. However, we are not proposed to go into the said aspect. Admittedly, the second respondent has directed the third respondent to look into the matter, take appropriate action and report the same. This has not been done.

3. In such view of the matter, we direct the respondent No.3 to take appropriate action, pursuant to the communication dated 29.06.2018, sent by the second respondent, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. The Writ Petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(WRITS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) To 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The District Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

4.The Tahsildar, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District.

5.The Village Administrative Officer, Sayanapuram Group, Office at Puliyur, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District.

+1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.80065. NB DS RSK SAR-4:26.09.2018: 2P/7C W.P.[MD].No.18358 of 2018 23.08.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/