Madras High CourtWMP(MD)/12832/2024dismissed

Pandiraj v. The District Collector

2024-09-12Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Thursday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI WMP(MD). No.12832 of 2024 in WP(MD)No.8487 of 2024 Pandiraj ... Impleading Petitioner/4th Respondent Vs 1 The District Collector Pudukkottai District Pudukkottai 2 The Block Development Officer Viralimalai Union Pudukkottai District 3 The President Sooriyur Village Panchayat, Viralimalai Taluk Pudukkottai District ... 1-3 Respondents/1-3Respondents 4 Sureshkumar ... 4th Respondent/Petitioner Prayer in WMP(MD). No.12832 of 2024 This Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 of India Constitution to implead the petitioner as 4th respondent in WP (MD) No.8487 of 2024 pending on the file of this Hon'ble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case and thus render justice.

Prayer in WP(MD). 8487/ 2024 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court (Water Body) Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to remove the paddy threshing floor is being constructed by the 3rd respondent inside the Colour Chetti Enthal Kulam comprised in Survey no. 240 with extent of 20 acre situated at Sooriyur Village, Viralimalai Taluk, Pudukkottai District based on the petitioners representation dated 27.03.2024 ORDER:- This Writ Miscellaneous Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.R.Balamuruganantham, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate for the 1st to 3rd Respondents, and of Mr.C.Ezhilarasu, Advocate for the 4th Respondent this Court made the following order:

The petitioner is not a necessary party to decide the issued raised in the main writ petition.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impleading petitioner has already carried out the contract work awarded to him. 3.We grant liberty to the impleading petitioner to proceed against the local body for appropriate relief.

4.With the aforesaid liberty, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) // True Copy // /10/2024 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS- I/ II / III / IV) TO 1 The District Collector Pudukkottai District,Pudukkottai 2 The Block Development Officer Viralimalai Union,Pudukkottai District 3 The President Sooriyur Village Panchayat, Viralimalai Taluk,Pudukkottai District Copy to:

The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai ORDER DATED : 12/09/2024 ==========================

ORDER

========================== WMP(MD). No.12832 of 2024 in WP(MD) No.8487 of 2024 Giving direction and etc.

as stated within.

MGJ(07.10.2024) 3P 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023