Suruli v. Chellapandian
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in WP(MD) No.23711 of 2023 and Sub Application(MD) No.271 of 2024 Suruli ... Petitioner Vs Chellapandian, Holding his office at Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk Office, Peraiyur, Madurai District.
...Contemnor PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court to to initiate contempt proceedings against the Contemnor/ Respondent and punish him for their willful disobedience of the order of this Court in WP(MD) No. 23711 of 2023, dated 29.09.2023.
For Petitioner :Mr.K.Surendran For Respondent :Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate 1/5
O R D E R
This Contempt petition has been filed that the order of this Court in WP(MD) No. 23711 of 2023, dated 29.09.2023 has not been complied with intentionally.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court has issued a direction to the respondent Tahsildar to conduct a survey in S.No.210/1A, Kalappanpatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District, within a period of six weeks. According to the petitioner, the survey has not been conducted as directed by by this Court.
3.Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent and submits that there are some disputes between the petitioner and one Perumal with regard to the subject property and the said Perumal has filed a suit as against this petitioner before the District Munsif Court in O.S.No.15 of 2024, based on which, he has objected the officials to survey the land as 2/5
directed by this Court. Since there is an objection from the said Perumal, the Department has obtained necessary police protection from the concerned police, conducted the survey on 26.03.2024, identified the boundaries in the presence of this petitioner and the same was acknowledged by the petitioner. Copy of the acknowledgment given by the petitioner is furnished to the petitioner's counsel. A copy of the proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 314/2024/S, dated 21.03.2025 of the Tahsildar, Peraiyur to that effect is also placed before this Court.
4.Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate and the scope of this contempt petition and also recording the proceeding of the Tahsildar in Na.Ka.No. 314/2024/S, dated 21.03.2025, this contempt petition is closed. Connected Sub Application is also closed.
21.03.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vrn 3/5
To The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk Office, Peraiyur, Madurai District.
4/5
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
vrn Order made in in WP(MD) No.23711 of 2023 21.03.2025 5/5