S. Ramakrishnan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of November Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.20174 of 2018 1.S. RAMAKRISHNAN 2.K. SARAVANASAMY ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEDASANDUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

( IN CRIME NO. 428 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.C.JEYAPRAKASH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the offences under Section 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime number 428 of 2018 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. When the matter was taken up today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue between the parties has been amicably settled. Both parties are present before this Court and filed joint compromise memo and seeking to close the case. The defacto complainant also admit the same and stated that he has no grievance and stated his willing to settle the issue. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.In view of the same nothing survives for adjudication in this

petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is closed and the respondent police is directed to take appropriate action by taking note the compromise entered between the parties. sd/- 15/11/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEDASANDUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.C.JEYAPRAKASH Advocate SR.No.21612

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20174 of 2018 Date :15/11/2018 TM AE/JC/SAR4/19.11.2018/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/