Saravanan v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Saravanan ... Petitioner versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Appanthirupathy Police Station, Madurai.

3. Vigneshwaran ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to take necessary legal actions against the 3rd respondent and to register the FIR, recover household articles from the 3rd respondent based on the complaint dated 24.04.2025. For Petitioner : No appearance 1/4

For R1 and R2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner, with a grievance that his complaint dated 24.04.2025 has not been enquired by the respondent Police, has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent Police to take necessary legal actions against the 3rd respondent based on his complaint dated 24.04.2025.

2. When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that the complaint of the petitioner was treated as petition enquiry in CSR No.150 of 2025. According to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the complaint of the petitioner is civil in nature. They have conducted an enquiry and closed the complaint on 2/4

23.05.2025.

4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. 03.06.2025 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Appanthirupathy Police Station, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 03.06.2025 4/4