← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14209/2020dismissed as infructuous

Dr.Subburam v. The District Collector

2022-11-24Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan,Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and W.M.P.(MD) No.11864 of 2020 Dr.Subburam ... Petitioner -vs1.The District Collector Madurai District, Madurai 2.The Tahsildar Office of the Tahsildar Madurai North, Madurai 3.The Authorized Officer HDB Financial Services Ltd., 4th Floor, Royal Towers 58/2, Greams Road, Chennai ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records made in the impugned order of the second respondent in letter No.Na.Ka.No.01230/2019/A3, dated 01.10.2020 and quash the same.

For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Senthil Kumar For Respondents :

Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.M.Kannan, Standing Counsel, for R3

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.] Challenge in this writ petition is to the notice dated 01.10.2020, issued by the second respondent, proposing to take possession of the secured asset.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel on either side, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous.

3. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel on either side, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 24.11.2022 Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No krk

To:

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai.

R.MAHADEVAN , J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

krk and W.M.P.(MD) No.11864 of 2020 24.11.2022