Sasi Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24.05.2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.VADAMALAI Sasikumar ... Petitioner/ Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu represented by The Inspector of Police, Mudukulathur Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.92 of 2023) ... Respondent/ Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.92 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) IPC, in Crime No.92 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, on 17.05.2023, the petitioner had attacked the defacto complainant by using aruval on his head. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner is not having any previous cases.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the facts that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner is not having any previous 1/3

cases, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of 30 days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 24/05/2023 / TRUE COPY / /05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

csm TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUDUKULATHUR.

2/3

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUDUKULATHUR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.DINESH. K, Advocate ( SR-7870[I] dated 25/05/2023 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9478 of 2023 Date :24/05/2023 RK/VR/SAR-4(29/05/2023) 3P/6C 3/3