← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12661/2023dismissed for nonprosecution

P.Selvam v. The District Colllector

2023-09-05Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar,Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.09.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY P.Selvam ... Petitioner -vs1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, 2.The Revenue Officer, Office of the Revenue Officer, 3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District.

4.Xavier 5.Sabarimuthu 6.Jothi Lazar 7.Thiraviyam ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation made in S.No.377/2 of Sendhurai Village of Natham Taluk of Dindigul District.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader For Respondents 4 to 7 : Mr.R.Rajesh

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.] When the Writ Petition was listed on 01.09.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ Petition was directed to be posed today either for disposal or for dismissal. Accordingly, the matter is posted today under the caption "for dismissal".

2. Despite the Writ Petition is posted today under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. [S.S.S.R, J.] [D.B.C., J.] 05.09.2023 Index : Yes / No sj To 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector,

2.The Revenue Officer, Office of the Revenue Officer, 3.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District.

S.S.SUNDAR , J.

and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J.

sj 05.09.2023