Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14317/2017dismissed

B.Maruthiya, v. The Chairman,

2017-09-20Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.08.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA WP(MD)No.14317 of 2017 and WMP(MD)No.11215 of 2017 B.Maruthiya ... Petitioner vs.

1)The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, 807, 2nd Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.

2)The Chairman/Sub Committee, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Egmore, Chennai-8.

3)The Superintendant of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.R2/150/2017, dated 27.07.2017 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reserve one post of Combined Recruitment of Grade-II Police Constables/Grade-II Jail Warders/Firemen-2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Subbaraj For Respondents : Mr.B.Pugalendhi Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, Special Government Pleader

ORDER

The petitioner has come to this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.R2/150/2017, dated 27.07.2017 to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reserve one post of Combined Recruitment of Grade-II Police Constables/Grade-II Jail Warders/Firemen-2017.

2.The impugned order has been questioned on the ground that during physical efficiency test, the petitioner's chest had not been measured properly, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

aside.

3.Considering the said submission, this Court directed the learned Additional Advocate General to produce the videographs taken during selection to the aforementioned posts. 4.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the videogrpahs in respect of chest measurement of the petitioner has been displayed before this Court in the presence of the petitioner and his counsel. The video clipping/recording shows that before expansion, the chest of the petitioner was measured as 82cms, but after expansion, it was only 84 cms. The minimum expansion of chest should be 5 cms, hence, this Court is not inclined to entertain the prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, this Writ Petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1)The Superintendant of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar District.

+1cc to Mr.P.SUBBARAJ Advocate in SR. No. 71723 +1cc to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER in SR. No.72377 NBI JS/KP/SAR.1/11.09.2017/2P-4C WP(MD)No.14317 of 2017 09.08.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/