← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14320/2017disposed of

Karunamoorthy, v. The Chairman,

2017-08-09Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.08.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.14320 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.11218 of 2017 Karunamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, 807, 2nd Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2.The Chairman / Sub Committee, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, Egmore, Chennai - 8.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Rc.No.R2/150/2017 dated 27.07.2017 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reserve one post of Combined Recruitment of Grade-II Police Constables / Grade-II Jail Warders / Firemen - 2017. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Subbaraj For Respondents : Mr.B.Pugazhendhi Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, Special Government Pleader.

O R D E R

By consent of both parties, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2.The petitioner, having passed S.S.L.C, applied for the post of Grade -II Police Constables / Grad-II Jail Warders / Fireman - 2017, when applications were called for by the respondent Police Department. Subsequently, after passing the written examination, the petitioner was called for for the Physical Endurance Test. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.Now, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the respondents have not measured the height of the petitioner

properly. As a result, he has been found disqualified on the ground that he is only 169 c.m.

4.In view thereof, when the matter was earlier listed before this Court, this Court directed the respondents to produce the video recordings taken at the time of measurement. 5.As per the said direction, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent Police Department produced the video recordings and the same was played before me in the presence of the learned counsel on either side and also the petitioner.

6.A perusal of the same would go to show that no doubt, while recording manually, the petitioner was found to be 169 c.m. However, it is disputed before this Court that as per the Instruction 45, the digital height of the petitioner was not measured and no record has also been produced before this Court to the effect that the respondents have measured the height of the petitioner, digitally. Therefore, the respondents are hereby directed to re-measure the height of the petitioner digitally.

7.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, 807, 2nd Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. 2.The Chairman / Sub Committee, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, Egmore, Chennai - 8.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

+1cc to M/S.P.Subbaraj, Advocate SR.No. 71726 W.P.(MD)No.14320 of 2017 09.08.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ mr/ta JM/SV MMS/SAR 2/23.08.2017/2P/5C