Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13168/2020allowed

Mutharakku v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-11Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13168 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13168 of 2020 1.K.Muthurakku 2.Panchavarnam@Panju 3.P.Thanikodi 4.P.Karuppusamy 5.R.Shenbagam @ Mayakannan 6.K.Vasanth Periyasamy 7.S.Jeyamurugan ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Jaihindpuram Police Station, Madurai City.

(Crime No.292 of 2020) 2.Rajeswari 3.P.Thanikodi 4.K.Muthurakku ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.292 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Gangai Amaran For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

For R2 : Mr.T.Veerakumar

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.292 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police.

2.The second respondent/defacto complainant and the petitioner/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent/defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioner would pray for quashing the FIR in Crime No.292 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police.

3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13168 of 2020 present before this Court today (11.12.2020) and the second respondent/defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.292 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ENCL:Xerox Copy of Joint Compromise Memo To 1.The Inspector of Police, Jaihindpuram Police Station, Madurai City.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CC to Mr.G.Gangai Amaran,Advocate,SR.No25354 dated 14/02/2021 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13168 of 2020 11.12.2020 SVN(CO) KB(23.03.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2