Palanichamy, S/O.Karuppan, v. The State Rep. By Addl.,Chief

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.08.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.(MD)No.15008 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)No.11846 of 2017 Palanichamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State rep. By Additional Chief Secretary/ Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Theni District, Theni.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.

4. V.Angayarkanni

5. Vijayalakshmi

6. K.Bhuvaneswari ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the revision petition I filed by the petitioner dated 14.03.2017 and representation submitted by the petitioner dated 07.06.2017 by raising additional grounds, within the stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Sivaraman For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan Additional Government Pleader (for R1 to R3) *****

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks for a direction to the second respondent to dispose of the revision petition dated 14.03.2017 and representation dated 07.06.2017 submitted by him by raising additional grounds, within the stipulated time. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Mr.G.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3.The petitioner would submit that aggrieved over the order passed by the third respondent, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the first respondent on 14.03.2017. He would further submit that the petitioner also sent a representation to the second respondent to dispose of the said appeal by raising additional grounds. Since no favourable order has been passed, the present writ petition.

4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the grounds of revision and additional grounds and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after providing opportunity to all necessary parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Additional Chief Secretary/ Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Theni District, Theni.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.

+ 1 CC TO Mr.D.SIVARAMAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 71892 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 72398 SKN TE/SV-MMS/SAR-II : 07/09/2017 : 2P/6C W.P.(MD)No.15008 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)No.11846 of 2017 10.08.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/