← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/15067/2017dismissed

M.Siranjeevi, S/O.Manokaran, v. The Member Secretary

2017-08-21Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.08.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.15067 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.11892 of 2017 M.Siranjeevi : Petitioner Vs.

1. The Member Secretary, The Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus, Pantheon Road, Egmore,Chennai -08.

2. The Chairman, Recruitment Sub Committee, Madurai Centre & Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai.

: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order bearing C.No.R2/150/2017 dated 08.08.2017, issued by the second respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to conduct retest for Long Jump to the petitioner in respect of recruitment for the post of Grade-II Police Constables (Men & Women and 3rd Gender), Grade-II Jail Warders (Men, Women) and Firemen for the year 2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan For Respondents : Mr.B.Pugazhendhi Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, Special Government Pleader.

O R D E R

*********** By consent of both sides, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2.The petitioner, having passed S.S.L.C, applied for the post of Grade -II Police Constables / Grad-II Jail Warders / Fireman - 2017, when applications were called for by the respondent Police Department. Subsequently, after passing the written examination, the petitioner was called for for the Physical Endurance Test. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Now, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the respondents have wrongly declared the petitioner as foul in the event of Long Jump.

4.In view thereof, when the matter was earlier listed before this Court, this Court directed the respondents to produce the video recordings taken at the time of measurement. 5.As per the said direction, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent Police Department produced the video recordings and the same was played before me in the presence of the learned counsel on either side and also the petitioner.

6. A perusal of the same in the Long Jump event would clearly show that the petitioner was able to reach only upto 3.71 feet, but was unable to reach 3.80 feet, which is the requisite level for being qualified. Therefore, the petitioner is rightly found disqualified by the respondent Police Department. 7.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Member Secretary, The Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai -08.

2. The Chairman, Recruitment Sub Committee, Madurai Centre & Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai.

+1 cc to The Special Government Pleader in SR.No.74196 MR/DAS AE/SV MMS/SAR2/08.09.2017/2P/4C W.P.(MD)No.15067 of 2017 21.08.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/