Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14402/2020disposed of

P.Mayandi v. The Secretary

2021-01-20Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.14402 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)No.12055 of 2020 P.Mayandi ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.

2. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

3. The Assistant Director of Panchayat(Rural), Office of the District Collector,

4. The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District.

5. The Commissioner/Block Development Officer, Thirumangalam Panchayat Union, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

6. The Superintending Engineer, State Highways Department, Algarkovil Main Road, Madurai.

7. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, State Highways Department, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

8. The Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 005.

1/3

9. The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Opp. To Anna Bus Stand, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing respondents 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 their men or agents or authorised persons from constructing underground waste collection bins or any other construction in Survey No.84/6A and 85/1A at Kokkulam Village, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.Thilagar, Government Advocate.

* * *

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner on the apprehension that the underground waste collection bins or other constructions will be put up in the petition mentioned survey numbers.

3. It appears that the petition mentioned survey numbers are to be exchanged in favour of the writ petitioner for having made use of the petitioner's some other lands. In fact the petitioner has filed an independent writ petition in that regard.

4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents states that there is no proposal to put up any kind of construction in the petition mentioned survey numbers.

5. Recording the said submission, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS- ) 2/3

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To: