← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/15380/2017dismissed

B.Soundarya Devi, v. The Chairman,

2017-08-22Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.15380 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.12185 & 12186 of 2017 B.Soundarya Devi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chairman, Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus, Chennai.

2.The Chairman Sub Committee/ Member, Recruitment Sub Committee Dindigul Centre, Dindigul Range, Dindigul.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in connection with the letter issued by the second respondent in C.No.R2/150/2017 dated 05.08.2017 and quash the same as illegal, consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the next level selection process such as long jump medical test etc, in pursuant of TNUSRB combined recruitment for Grade II Police Constable / Grade II Warders/Fireman (Men & Women) 2017 if the petitioner found eligible in long jump event during re-long jump event.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondent : Mr. B.Pugazhendhi, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

By consent of both parties, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2.The petitioner, having passed S.S.L.C, applied for the post of Grade -II Police Constables / Grad-II Jail Warders / Fireman - 2017, when applications were called for by the respondent Police Department. Subsequently, after passing the written examination, the petitioner was called for for the Physical Endurance Test. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Now, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the respondents have not seen properly when she jumped in the long jump event. As a result, she has been found disqualified. 4.In view thereof, when the matter was earlier listed before this Court, this Court directed the respondents to produce the video recordings taken at the time of measurement. 5.As per the said direction, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent Police Department produced the video recordings and the same was played before me in the presence of the learned counsel for the respondents and also the petitioner.

6.A perusal of the same would go to show that the petitioner has jumped only upto 2.03 metres in the long jump event as against the requisite distance of 3.00 metres, for being qualified. Therefore, she is rightly disqualified by the respondent Police.

7. Therefore, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Member Secretary, Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Chennai.

2.The Chairman Sub Committee, Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Virudhunagar Range, Virudhunagar.

+1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 74263 W.P.(MD)No. 15380 of 2017 22.08.2017 DSK JM/SV MMS/SAR 2/12.09.2017/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/