Madras High CourtWP(MD)/15424/2017disposed of

Syed Ahamed , v. The Inspector General Of

2017-08-17Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.08.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.(MD)No.15424 of 2017 Syed Ahamed ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Santhome Road, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department Madurai.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose the enquiry proceedings based on the communication of the first respondent in Mu.Mu.No.2780/U4/2017 dated 30.01.2017 within stipulated time.

For Petitioner :Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondents :Mr.A.Muthukaruppan Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The petitioner seeks for a direction to the second respondent to dispose the enquiry proceedings based on the communication of the first respondent in Mu.Mu.No.2780/U4/2017 dated 30.01.2017. 2.Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.Mr.RM.ArunSwaminathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner sent a representation to the first respondent to take action against the District Registrar, Ramanathapuram on 16.01.2017. The first respondent has referred the matter to the second respondent by his proceedings Mu.Mu.No.2780/U4/2017 dated 30.01.2017 to take necessary action. Since there is no progress, the present writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would further submit that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the second respondent to pass orders based on the communication sent by the first respondent.

5. In the light of the above facts and considering the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to dispose of the enquiry proceeding based on the communication of the first respondent, dated 30.01.2017, within the period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after providing opportunity to all necessary parties.

6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Santhome Road, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department Madurai.

+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.73222 +One cc to M/s.Chettinad Legal Solutions, SR.No.72800 sss/skn RL/5C/2P/SV/MMS/SAR1/6/9/2017 W.P.(MD)No.15424 of 2017 17.08.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/