Prabhakaran, v. Tamilnadu Uniform Services
pBEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.08.2017 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.15437 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.12224 of 2017 Prabhakaran ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office, Pantheon Road,Egmore, Chennai - 8.
2.The Chairman Recruitment Sub-Committee, Madurai Centre, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Madurai City Armed Reserved Ground, Reserve Line, Madurai District, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by in C.No.R2/150/2017 dated 07.08.2017 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to redo the physical efficiency test including the rope claiming event for the petitioner in respect of recruitment of Grade-II Police Constable/Grade-II Jail Warders and Fireman.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chellapandian For Respondents : Mr.B.Pugazhendhi, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
*********** By consent of both parties, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2.The petitioner, having passed S.S.L.C, applied for the post of Grade -II Police Constables / Grad-II Jail Warders / Fireman - 2017, when applications were called for by the respondent Police Department. Subsequently, after passing the written examination, the petitioner was called for for the Physical Endurance Test. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.Now, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the respondents have not seen him properly while climbing the rope. As a result, he has been found disqualified.
4.In view thereof, when the matter was earlier listed before this Court, this Court directed the respondents to produce the video recordings taken at the time of measurement. 5.As per the said direction, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent Police Department produced the video recordings and the same was played before me in the presence of the learned counsel on either side and also the petitioner.
6.A perusal of the video recordings would go to show that the petitioner was even not able to climb upto two metres as against the requisite distance for being qualified. Therefore, the petitioner is rightly found disqualified by the respondent Police Department.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office, Pantheon Road,Egmore, Chennai - 8.
2.The Chairman Recruitment Sub-Committee, Madurai Centre, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Madurai City Armed Reserved Ground, Reserve Line, Madurai District, +One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.74214 dsk RL/4C/2P/SV/MMS/SAR1/14/9/2017 W.P.(MD)No. 15437 of 2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 21.08.2017