Jeyakumar, S/O.J.Baskara Sethu v. Tamilnadu Uniform Services
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.08.2017 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.15438 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.12225 of 2017 Jeyakumar ... Petitioner Vs.
1. Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai -8.
2. The Chairman Recruitment Sub Committee, Madurai Centre, Tamilnadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, Madurai City Armed Reserved Ground, Reserve Line,Madurai District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed in C.No.R2/150/2017 dated 08.08.2017 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to redo the physical efficiency test including the rope claiming event for the petitioner in respect of recruitment of Grade-II Police Constable/Grade-II Jail Warders and Firemen. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chellapandian For Respondents : B.Pugalendhi Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
By consent of both parties, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2.The petitioner, having passed S.S.L.C, applied for the post of Grade -II Police Constables / Grad-II Jail Warders / Fireman - 2017, when applications were called for by the respondent Police Department. Subsequently, after passing the written examination, the petitioner was called for for the Physical Endurance Test. 3.Now, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the respondents have not seen petitioner properly while he climbed the rope. As a result, he has been found disqualified. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4.In view thereof, when the matter was earlier listed before this Court, this Court directed the respondents to produce the video recordings taken at the time of measurement. 5.As per the said direction, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent Police Department produced the video recordings and the same was played before me in the presence of the learned counsel on either side and also the petitioner.
6.A perusal of the same would go to show that the petitioner is not able to place his chin on the red mark on the rope. Hence, the petitioner is rightly found disqualified by the respondent Police Department.
7.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai -8.
2. The Chairman Recruitment Sub Committee, Madurai Centre, Tamilnadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, Madurai City Armed Reserved Ground, Reserve Line,Madurai District.
+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.74215 DSK VB/GT/SAR3/15/09/2017/2P/4C W.P.(MD)No.15438 of 2017 21.08.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/