← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9195/2025allowed

Tamilselvan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-08-19Honourable Mr Justice P.Vadamalai5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19.08.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI Tamilselvan ... Petitioner/ Accused No.3 Vs State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District.

(Crime No.1 of 2025) .. Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Bala Karthick For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.

1/5

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 & 120(b) of IPC, in Crime No.1 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the subject property originally belonged to the father of the defacto complainant namely Rama Iyengar, however, A1 is said to have created forged documents by including those properties in the year 1974. These properties were sold in favour of A2 by registered sale deed dated 15.02.2024. Further, this petitioner/A3 is the document writer and A5 and A6 stood as witnesses to those documents. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is a document writer, a false case has been given. He further submitted that A2, A5 and A6 have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.OP(MD).Nos.841 & 917 of 2025 dated 21.01.2025 He further submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and he is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/5

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and the investigation is almost completed. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner is the document writer and co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court and the investigation has been almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai and on further conditions that:

(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; 3/5

(b) the petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai. In the event of any change in his residential address, the petitioner shall report the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai. (c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

4/5

(g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.

sd/- 19/08/2025 / TRUE COPY / /09/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.-I/ II /III/ IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

msrm To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/S.S.Bala Karthick, Advocate ( SR-52791[I] dated 20/08/2025 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9195 of 2025 Date :19/08/2025 PS/SAR.09.09.2025 5P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5