Madras High CourtWP(MD)/15690/2017disposed of

R.Muni Subramanian, v. The Commissioner And

2019-04-30Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD) No.15690 of 2017 S.Muni Subramanian ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Personnel & Administrative Reforms, (PER.A) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St. George Fort, Chennai.

2.The Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St. George Fort, Chennai.

3.The Director of Collegiate Education, Directorate of Collegiate Education, Chennai - 600 006.

4.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Palam Station Road, Madurai.

5.The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai.

6.The Director, Directorate of Distance Education, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai.

7.The Secretary, Rajapalayam Raju's College, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third and fourth respondents to approve the proposal of seventh respondent dated 31.01.2017 promoting the petitioner as laboratory Assistant on the strength of G.O.M.S.No.528 dated 18.05.1985 and GO.Ms No.110, dated 17.09.1985 and based on his earlier representation, dated 15.03.2017 and final representation, dated 08.08.2017 according to law.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthalraj For Respondents: Mr.S.Angappan Government Advocate for R1 to R4 : Mr.D.Anandan for R5 to R7

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the third and fourth respondents to approve the proposal of the seventh respondent dated 31.01.2017 promoting the petitioner as laboratory Assistant on the strength of G.O.M.S.No.528 dated 18.05.1985 and GO.Ms No.110, dated 17.09.1985 and based on his earlier representation, dated 15.03.2017 and final representation, dated 08.08.2017 according to law.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 4, on instructions submitted that subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petition, an order came to be passed on 01.03.2017 by negating the claim of the petitioner.

3. In view of the above submission, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order dated 01.03.2017, in the manner known to law.

4. Granting such liberty, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Writs) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Ssl

To 1.The Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Personnel & Administrative Reforms, (PER.A) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St. George Fort, Chennai.