M.Priya, v. The District Registrar,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.08.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.(MD)No.15872 of 2017 M.Priya ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Periyakulam, Theni District.

2. The Sub Registrar, Chinnamanur Sub Registrar Office, Theni District.

3.A.Rajangam 4.R.Ochammal 5.R.Balasubramani 5.P.Sivagami ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to conduct enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 15.05.2017 which is pending before him in file No.2030/E2/2017 and pass final orders in it after affording an opportunity of hearing the respondents 2 to 6 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Brijesh Kishore For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan Addl. Govt. Pleader (For R1 and R2)

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent herein to conduct enquiry on her representation dated 15.05.2017, which is pending before him in file No.2030/E2/2017 and pass final orders in it after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respondents 2 to 6.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3.The case of the petitioner is that the respondents 3 to 6 had entered into sale agreement with the petitioner on 14.10.2015 agreeing to sell the property to an extent of 1581 square feet in S.No.590/1A1A of Chinnamanur Village. Based on the agreement, the petitioner had paid Rs.3,50,000/- as advance. Subsequently, the petitioner came to know that the respondents 3 to 6 are not the owners of the property and they have created a settlement deed and other documents. Hence, the petitioner gave a representation to the first respondent to take action. Since no favourable order was passed, the present writ petition has been filed. 4.Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that based on the representation of the petitioner, a notice was already issued to the parties.

5.In the light of the above facts, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.05.2017 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after providing opportunity to all necessary parties, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Periyakulam,Theni District.

2. The Sub Registrar, Chinnamanur Sub Registrar Office, Theni District.

+1cc to Mr.B.Brijesh kishore, Advocate in SR.No.73997 +1cc to The Special Government Pleader in SR.No.74707 skn AE/MR KKR/SAR3/11.09.2017/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ W.P.(MD)No.15872 of 2017 23.08.2017