Pandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of January Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.22784 of 2018 1.PANDI 2 CHINNAMURUGAN 3 MAYAKKAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, OTTANCHATRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(IN CRIME NO. 10 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.K.MANIKANDAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.CHANDRASEKAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- When the matter came on 24.01.2019 there was no representation for the petitioners and the same was directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal" on 28.01.2019.

2.Today, the matter was posted under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation for the petitioners. 3.Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- 28/01/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, OTTANCHATRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22784 of 2018 Date :28/01/2019 AE/VR/SAR3/07.02.2019/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/