Pulliyappan v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04.09.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Puliyappan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Kamuthi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.76 of 2025).

... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.R.Udhayakumar For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.76 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER: The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 340(2) of BNS, 2023, in the alleged case in Crime No.76 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

1/4

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has created the forged sale deed. Therefore, on 08.04.2025 at about 11.00 A.M, the defacto-complainant preferred a complaint against the petitioner before the respondent police. Hence, the apprehension of arrest. Hence, a case has been registered as against the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the offences committed by the petitioner are serious in nature. 5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar 2/4

card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

sd/- 04/09/2025 / TRUE COPY / /2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

3/4

TMG TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kamuthi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.R.UDHAYAKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-9704[I] dated 08/09/2025 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8402 of 2025 Date :04/09/2025 AS/16.09.2025/4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 4/4