Rajendran v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.07.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM CRL.O.P (MD) Nos.12848 and 12898 of 2022 Rajendran ... Petitioner in both petitions Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

3. Manimala ... Respondents in both petitions PRAYER in Crl.O.P(MD) No.12848 of 2022: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to issue a direction to the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the petitioner's representation, dated 15.05.2022.

1/5

PRAYER in Crl.O.P(MD) No.12898 of 2022: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to issue a direction to the first respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members life and limb on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner on 10.06.2022.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Kudalingam In both petitions For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl.Side) in Crl.O.P(MD) No.12848 of 2022 For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) in Crl.O.P(MD) No.12898 of 2022 C O M M O N O R D E R Crl.O.P(MD) No.12848 of 2022 is filed for a direction to the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry, on the basis of the petitioner's representation, dated 15.05.2022.

2. Crl.O.P(MD) No.12898 of 2022 is filed for a direction to the first respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his 2/5

family members life and limb on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner on 10.06.2022.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen and retired employee of Central Government Air service. The petitioner's son married the third respondent and due to misunderstanding between them, they are living separately for the past two years. Now, the daughter-in-law gave a complaint against the petitioner's son and as well as the petitioner. Based on the complaint, the second respondent police harassed the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. Hence, the petitioner has filed these Petitions.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that after receiving the complaint, enquiry was conducted and the parties are advised to approach the Civil Court for getting appropriate remedy and the same was closed and as on date, there is no complaint and petition against this petitioner. 3/5

5. Recording the above submission, these Criminal Original Petitions are closed.

18.07.2022 Internet:Yes./No Index:Yes/no ebsi To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

ebsi ORDER IN CRL.O.P (MD) Nos.12848 & 12898 of 2022 18.07.2022 5/5