R.Saranaya Devi v. The Director General Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.08.2017 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.16258 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.12930 &12931of 2017 R.Saranya Devi ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Director General of Police, O/O. The Director General of Police, Chennai.
2. The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Uniform Service Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai.
3. The Chairman, Sub Committee Member, Tamil Nadu Uniform Service Recruitment Board, Dindigul Centre.
... Respondents PRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in his proceedings in C.No.R2/150/2017 dated 05.08.2017 quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to declare the result for the post of Grade II Police Constable/Grade II Jail Warden and fireman and to grant such further or other orders at this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.A.M.Raja For Respondents : Mr.B.Pugalendhi Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
By consent of both parties, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2.The petitioner, having passed S.S.L.C, applied for the post of Grade -II Police Constables / Grade-II Jail Warders / Fireman - 2017, when applications were called for by the respondent Police Department. Subsequently, after passing the written examination, the petitioner was called for the Physical Endurance Test. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.Now, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the respondents disqualified the petitioner on the ground that she has not completed the assigned 100 mts running event within the stipulated time, since she has taken 17.82 seconds instead of 17.30 seconds.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner participated in the 100 meters running event. In the 100 meters running event, even though, the petitioner reached the target fixed by the respondents within the time limit, she was found disqualified, on the ground that she failed to reach 100 mts within the stipulated time. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court with the present writ petition. 5.
When the similar candidates, who were issued with similar disqualification slip approached this Court well in time, this Court considered their cases and gave directions to the respondents to re-consider all doubtful cases by giving them chances of re-measurement of height, chest, long jump, shot put, rope climbing, 100 meters, 400 meters and 1500 meters running event and the said process is going to be over shortly. While so, the petitioner cannot approach this Court belatedly. The reason is that giving time to issue notice to the respondents and taking their response will delay the completion of the recruitment process as ordered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.183 of 2013 (Manish Kumar Vs. Union of India and others) dated 24.04.2017. Therefore, this Court is unable to entertain this writ petition.
7. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. The Director General of Police, O/O. The Director General of Police, Chennai.
+1cc to M/S. M.A.M.RAJA, Advocate, SR.No.75023. +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.75410. W.P.(MD)No.16258 of 2017 29.08.2017 smi/RR SDS/SV:MMS/SAR 3/30.08.2017/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/