Jeyakumar @ Jattikumar v. The Director General Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 18.12.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P(MD)No.14455 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD).No.11398 of 2021 Jeyakumar @ Jattikumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Alagar Kovil Main Road, Madurai-625 007.

3. The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station, Madurai.

Crime No.2716 of 2020

4. The Joint Director and Head of Chennai Zone, Central Bureau of Investigation, 3rd Floor, EVK Sampath Building, College Road, Chennai-6.

5. The Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Madurai.

... Respondents 1/7

Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other order or direction in the nature of writ directing the 1st Respondent to transfer the investigation of the case in Crime No.2716 of 2020 on the file of the 3rd Respondent to any other investigating agency.

For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for R1 to R3 : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI for R5

ORDER

This Writ petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to transfer the investigation of the case in Crime No.2716 of 2020 on the file of the third respondent to any other investigating agency. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 10.12.2020 at about 10.00 hours, the Sub Inspector of Police, D2 Sellur Police Station, received a secret information from the informer regarding the illegal sale of Ganja in the locality. 2/7

Based on the secret information, the Sub Inspector of Police, after obtaining permission from the Inspector of Police went along with the police persons to the occurrence place and the informer identified two persons carrying white colour gunny bag. The accused persons tried to escape from the place on seeing the police parties. The police parties secured them and on enquiry, they introduced themselves. The Police officials, after showing their Identity Card and after complying all the legal formalities conducted search and found nearly about 31 kgs of Ganja in a white colour gunny bag. After taking the samples, the remaining Ganja was seized from the above said persons and after complying the legal formalities, the Sub Inspector of Police, arrested the petitioner and another accused persons on 10.12.

2020 and gave a report under Section 57 of the NDPS Act. Based on which, a case in Crime No.2716 of 2020 for the offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29(1) of NDPS Act, was registered. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the investigation is completed by the third respondent and thereafter, he has also filed proper final report before the concerned Court and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.187 of 2021.

of Cr.P.C., is also completed. Thereafter, the case was posted for arguments. 4.Since the final report has already been filed and the case was taken on file in C.C.No.120 of 2021 and also reached the stage of arguments, therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition.

5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Romila Thapar and others Vs. Union of India and others reported in (2018) 10 SCC 753 has reiterated the consistent view that the accused cannot ask for changing the investigating agency or to do investigation in particular manner including for Court monitoring investigation.

6.The case of the petitioner is that a false case was registered against him for the offence under Section 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c), 29(i) of NDPS Act, 1985. According to the petitioner, he was illegally taken under the custody of the police, before the registration of the said case. The relative of the petitioner already sent a representation before registering the case under the NDPS Act, 1985, informing the above illegal detention. The said contention of the petitioner are the matter for defence during the course of trial and the same is not the 4/7

ground for transfer of the investigation to the CBI. The Hon'ble Supreme Court issued the detailed guidelines to transfer the case to CBI in the case of State of W.B. v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, reported in 2010 (3) SCC 571 and the petitioner's case is not come under any of the above guidelines.

7. Therefore, this Court finds no ground to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 18.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No sbn 5/7

To

1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Alagar Kovil Main Road, Madurai-625 007.

3. The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station, Madurai.

4. The Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Madurai.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

6/7

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

sbn W.P(MD)No.14455 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD).No.11398 of 2021 18.12.2023 7/7