← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13068/2020allowed

J.Jeganathan v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-11-23Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13068 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13068 of 2020 1.J.Jeganathan 2.Vijayapandi ... Petitioners Vs.

1.State Represented by Inspector of Police, Sempatty Police Station, Sempatty, Dindigul District-624 707 (FIR No.202 of 2015) 2.P.Tharmaraja ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.202 of 2015 dated 03.07.2015 on the file of the first respondent police for alleged offence under Sections 147, 294(b), 341, 332, 506(i) IPC and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Sethu Mahendran For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor.

For R2 : Mr.S.Lenin Prabu

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.202 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent police for alleged offence under Sections 147, 294(b), 341, 332, 506(i) IPC.

2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the FIR in Crime No.202 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent police.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13068 of 2020 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today(11.12.2020) and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.202 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Encl:Xerox copy of joint compromise memo GNS Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Sempatty Police Station, Sempatty, Dindigul District-624 707.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13068 of 2020 11.12.2020 KM (06.01.2021) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2