← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11491/2020allowed

Vino Selin@Anto Sahaya Vinoth v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-10-16Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11491 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.11491 of 2020 1.Vino Selin @ Anto Sahaya Vinoth 2.Parveen @ Anto Sahya Praveen ... Petitioners/Accused 1 and 2 Vs.

State through by 1.The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.544 of 2018) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Saravanan ...2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.544 of 2018 dated 12.11.2018 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.C.Susi Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.V.Chandrasekar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 Mr.Maheswaran for R2

ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed for quashing the impugned First Information Report in Crime No.544 of 2018. It has been registered on the file of Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District, for the offences under Sections 341, 342, 294 (b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C.

2. Saravanan is the defacto complainant. The defacto complainant appeared before this Court through video conferencing. His identity is also confirmed before me. The defacto complainant has no objection for quashing the impugned First Information Report. When the parties have buried the hatchet, no purpose will be served https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/4

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11491 of 2020 in keeping the prosecution alive. The impugned First Information Report is quashed. The criminal original petition is allowed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ias NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:- 1.The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.11491 of 2020 16.10.2020 km(CO) KK(03.11.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/4