← Library
Madras High CourtWA(MD)/1866/2023dismissed

Swarnaverriah v. The District Collector

2023-10-20Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr Justice V. Lakshminarayanan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.10.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and C.M.P.(MD) No.14260 of 2023 Swarnaverriah ... Appellant/Petitioner -Vs.-

1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

... Respondents/Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order dated 31.01.2023 made in W.P.(MD)No.1813 of 2013 on the file of this Court.

For Appellant : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar Additional Government Pleader **** 1/4

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The order dated 31.01.2023, passed in W.P.(MD) No.1813 of 2023, is sought to be quashed in the present Writ Appeal.

2. The relief sought for in the Writ Proceedings by the appellant would reveal that the said relief, if granted, amounts to declaration of title and the possession of the appellant. Such a relief of title or possession, if indirectly sought for in the Writ Proceedings, cannot be entertained.

3. Learned Single Judge considered the issue and found dispute regarding title exists and more so, the relief sought for is also misconceived.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant made a submission that applications are made only to correct the revenue records. Mere correction of revenue records is permissible and therefore, the order of learned Single Judge is erroneous. 2/4

5. We are unable to agree with the said argument, in view of the fact that mere correction of revenue records, if permitted, by issuing a direction by this Court, there is a likelihood of causing infringement of civil rights of other parties, who may not be before us. Any orders causing such repercussions are to be passed by the competent civil Court of law by way of trial nature proceedings and such a roving enquiry cannot be conducted by the Writ Court. Revenue records would not confer title. Thus, the appellant has to establish his civil rights based on the documents in evidences independently and by impleading all necessary parties. This being the procedure contemplated under law, the learned Single Judge is right in relegating the appellant to approach the competent civil Court of law and therefore, we are not inclined to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge.

6. Accordingly, the order of the learned Single Judge dated 31.01.2023, passed in W.P.(MD) No.1813 of 2023, stands confirmed and the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

[S.M.S.J.,] & [V.L.N.J.,] NCC :Yes/No 20.10.2023 Index :Yes/No SJ 3/4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

SJ To

1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

20.10.2023 4/4