Rajesh v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06/06/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.9696 of 2023

1. Rajesh

2. Selvam @ Thee Selvam @ Subramanian ... Petitioners/Accused No.3 & 4 Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Somarasampet Police Station, Somarasampet, Trichy District.

(Crime No.157 of 2023).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ananda Kumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.157 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A3 and A4, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 342, 307 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.157 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to enmity with regard to temple festival, the petitioners along with other accused abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and A1 attacked the defacto complainant with aruval on his head and the second petitioner also attacked the de-facto complainant's friend Chandru and ran away from the scene of occurrence. Hence, the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

4.It is seen that there are 11 accused involved in this case, in which, the petitioners are arrayed as A3 and A4. That apart, the first petitioner is having three previous cases and the second petitioner is having four previous cases. On perusal of photographs produced by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor revealed that the accused persons brutally attacked the de-facto complainant in order to do away his life. Fortunately, now he is alive. He sustained grievous injuries on his head. Therefore, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is very much required in this case. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.In the result, the petition stands dismissed. sd/- 06/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / /06/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

sji TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SOMARASAMPET POLICE STATION, SOMARASAMPET, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9696 of 2023 Date :06/06/2023 SS/SSS/12/06/2023/2P/3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis