← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11430/2021partly allowed

Murugesan v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-08-19Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19.08.2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI 1.Murugesan 2.Iyyappan ... Petitioners/Accused (Rank Not Known) Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruppunnavasal Police Station, Pudukottai District.

Cr.No.49 of 2021.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.G.D.Manikandan, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.49 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379, 427, 323 and 147 IPC r/w Sections 21(1) and 21(2) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation)Act, 1957 in Crime No.49 of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have illegally transported one unit of river sand. Therefore, the present case came to be registered.

1/4

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case. However, to show his bona fide, the petitioner has come forward to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/-each to the credit of Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund.

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioners have transported one unit of river sand illegally. He further submitted that the first petitioner is having two other cases, which are similar in nature and the second petitioner is having one similar case. 5.Considering facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the first petitioner is having two similar cases, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the first petitioner. 6.Though the second petitioner is having other case, which is similar in nature, considering the fact that the petitioner in order to show his bona fide, has also come forward to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- to the credit of Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the second petitioner.

Accordingly, this criminal original petition is partlyallowed on condition that the second petitioner shall pay Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) to the credit of Government of Tamil Nadu, CMPRF in IOB, Secretariat Branch, Chennai9 (Account No.11720 10000 00070, IFSC Code: IOBA0001172), without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District.

7.On production of such receipt/acknowledgment, the second petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District, on condition that the second petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the second petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the second petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 am., until further orders.

[c]the second petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. 2/4

[d]the second petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the second petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the second petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

8.It is needless to say that any tool or instrument or vehicle used for illegal quarrying/ transportation of sand is liable to be seized under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and any vehicle or instrument or tool which has been seized under Section 21 (4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, is liable to be confiscated under Section 21(4-A) of the Act.

9.Though the above provision mandates the authorities to confiscate the tool or instrument or vehicle involved in the commission of the offence of illegal quarrying / transportation of sand, the authorities have not invoked the provision of 21 (4-A) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and therefore, a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.19936 of 2016, etc., batch has emphasised the need for confiscation of the vehicles. Consequently, the Government has also issued certain directions to the authorities of Revenue, Police and Forest and Geology and Mining departments to seize the vehicles and for confiscation of the same in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries (MMC-2) Department, dated 05.08.2020. Therefore, the respondent police is directed to proceed further as per Section 21 (4-A) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and as per the guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries (MMC-2) Department, dated 05.08.2020.

sd/- 19/08/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

GNS 3/4

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District.

2.Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pudukottai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppunnavasal Police Station, Pudukottai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Copy to The Officer Incharge, Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Finance(CMPRF) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11430 of 2021 Date : 19.08.2021 TR/VR/SAR-III(03.09.2021) 4P 6C 4/4