← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20497/2018granted

Pitchaikani v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-11-16Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of November Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.20497 of 2018 1 PITCHAIKANI 2 MOHAMMED ASARUTHIN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLAL POLICE STATION, CRIME NO.174/2018.

SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.C.SUSI KUMAR, Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 427 and 506(ii) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.174 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners are the husband and son of the defacto complainant. Due to domestic quarrel, the petitioners abused and assaulted the defacto complainant.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have nothing to do with the alleged occurrence. He further submitted that the petitioners have preferred a complaint against the defacto complainant, which has been registered in Crime No.173 of 2018, since it is a counter case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent police submitted that the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioners fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 16/11/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIL MAGISTRATE, KARAIKUDI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLAL POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.21724 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.20497 of 2018 Date :16/11/2018 RMI PK/JC/SAR-4/22.11.2018 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/