Subbiah v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.07.2022 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Subbiah
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
2.The Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to grant permission and protection to conduct the ''Adalum Paadalum'' dance programme on 16.07.2022 and 18.07.2022 from 8.00 p.m. to 11.00 p.m. in pursuant to the Aani festival of Arulmighu Sri Maha Kaliyamman Temple, situated at North Pudukudi, Kottaipattinam Post, Manamelkudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 30.06.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (crl.side) 1/5
O R D E R
This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to grant permission and protection to conduct the ''Adalum Paadalum'' dance programme on 16.07.2022 and 18.07.2022 from 8.00 p.m. to 11.00 p.m. in connection with the Aani festival of Arulmighu Sri Maha Kaliyamman Temple, situated at North Pudukudi, Kottaipattinam Post, Manamelkudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 30.06.2022.
2.Mr.M.Sakthikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that temple festival, by name, Arulmighu Sri Maha Kaliyamman Temple, situated at North Pudukudi, Kottaipattinam Post, Manamelkudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District is going to be held on 16.07.2022 and 18.07.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 2/5
30.06.2022. But the second respondent has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.
4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the second respondent has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019 along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent police is hereby 3/5
directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.06.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.
7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
05.07.2022 Index :Yes/No vsd To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
2.The Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5
V.SIVAGNANAM., J.
vsd 05.07.2022 5/5