← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11727/2021dismissed as infructuous

K.Paulraj v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-09-29Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

CRL OP (MD) No.11727 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.09.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP (MD) No.11727 of 2021 1.K.Paulraj 2.P.Kaliammal 3.Manjunathan ... Petitioners -Vs1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Additional Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Karur.

4.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Karur District.

5. Kirithiga

6. Theras Angel Mary ... Respondents PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents 2 to 4 as not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the respondents 5 & 6.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Mathiyalagan For R1 to R4 : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition is filed seeking direction to the respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere in the civil dispute on the basis of the complaint given by the private respondents herein. 2 When the matter was taken up for hearing on 18.08.2021, notice was ordered to the respondents 5 and 6 returnable today. When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners appeared before the Enquiry Officer and during the course of enquiry, they have agreed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP (MD) No.11727 of 2021 to work out their remedy through civil proceedings, which is pending in O.S.No.577 of 2021.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor circulated a copy of the closure report in which it is stated that the parties have agreed to work out their remedy before the concerned court.

4. In view of the closure report, the question of interference into the civil dispute by the official respondents may not arise. Recording the statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the statement made by the petitioners before the respondent police, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cm Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Additional Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Karur.

4.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Karur District.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP (MD) No.11727 of 2021 29.09.2021 GC(12.10.2021) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2