Chithra v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.06.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Chithra ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police,, North Police Station (Crime Branch), Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

3.Sudha

...Respondents

PRAYER :Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second respondent not to interfere in civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 11.06.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For R1 & R2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

O R D E R

The petitioner, with a grievance that the respondent police is harassing her in a civil dispute, has approached this Court. 2.Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and submits that based on a complaint given by one Sudha/the third respondent, petition enquiry has been conducted in Current paper No.358/PET-Direct/SDO-H/2024, dated 13.05.2024 and the same was closed on 18.06.2024 advising the parties to approach the civil Court to redress their grievance.

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this writ petition is closed. No costs. 26.06.2024 NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

vrn 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police,, North Police Station (Crime Branch), Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

vrn Order made in 26.06.2024 4/4