← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20638/2018granted

C.Sudhersanbabu v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-11-23Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.20638 of 2018 1.C.SUDHERSANBABU 2.G.SIVAKUMAR 3.G.SASIKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK Nos.1 to 3 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAMANATHAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT Crime No.198/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners:Mr.S.MALAIKANI Advocate For Respondent :Mr.ASOKAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.198 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant with regard to local body election, due to which, the petitioners way laid them, attacked and scolded in a filthy language. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent police submitted that in this case, A4 had attacked the victim with hands and wooden log and A4 was arrested and released on bail. He further submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioners fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 23/11/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAMANATHAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.S.MALAIKANI Advocate SR.No.21961

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20638 of 2018 Date :23/11/2018 PK/JC/SAR.4/28.11.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/