J.Rosy Grace Angeline v. The Inspector Of Police
C rl.O.P.(MD)No.12301 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.11.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12301 of 2020 1.J.Rosy Grace Angeline 2.D.Jeba Priya 3.S.Ketzie@ D.S.Getzie 4.R.Charles 5.A.Charles 6.R.David Chandrakumar 7.B.Samvel 8.C.John Victor 9.S.Joseph Abraham 10.A.Emerson Dharmaraj 11.V.Simon Babu ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.2,3,5-7,9 & 11-15 Vs.
1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police South Gate Police Station Madurai City
...Respondent/Complainant
2.F.Felix Keba 3.S.Frankilin Arul Steepan @ S.Franklin Arul Stephan 4.Hendri Richart @ Hendri Richard
...Respondents/L.W.2,3 & 10.
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.218 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai and quash the same as far as these petitioners are concerned. For Petitioners : Mr.C.Muthusaravanan For R-1 : Ms.S.E.Veronica Vincent Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R2 to R4 : Mr.M.Ramesh
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.218 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai for an alleged offence under Sections 147, 294(b), 355, 323, 296 and 506(i) I.P.C.
2.There was a dispute arose between the petitioners and the respondent nos.2 to 4 regarding the administration of the Church namely St.George Church. Now, the petitioners and the respondents are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter in issue between them has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
C rl.O.P.(MD)No.12301 of 2020 been amicably resolved and therefore, the respondents 2 to 4 are not willing to prosecute the case and therefore, would pray for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.218 of 2018.
3. The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties are also present personally along with their respective counsels and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would state that she has verified their identity.
4. In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceeding in C.C.No.218 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai is quashed as far as these petitioners are concerned. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) msa Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.
Encl : Photocopy of Compromise memo is enclosed herewith. To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.IV Madurai 2.The Inspector of Police South Gate Police Station Madurai City 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12301 of 2020 04.11.2020 CK(CO) AP(18/11/2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2