Arumugam v. K.Manickam

C.M.A.(MD).No.182 of 2022 N.ANAND VENKATESH.J., AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN.J., The matter was listed under the caption ''for being mentioned'' on the ground that the first appellant died on 12.09.2024 and that the second and third appellants are the legal heirs of the first appellant. While passing the order, this was not incorporated in the order and therefore, it was mentioned and the case was listed under the caption for being mentioned.

2. In the cause title, against the name of the first appellant, it shall be shown as died and the appellants 2 and 3 shall be shown as the legal heirs of the deceased first appellant.

3. Last three lines at paragraph No.16 of the order, shall be substituted as follows:

1/3

Therefore, the second appellant is entitled to Rs.40,000/- towards consortium. The appellants/claimants are entitled a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses and Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate.

4. The paragaraph No.17 shall be substituted as follows: 17.In total, the appellants/claimants are entitled to Rs.20,00,000/- towards compensation together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of realization. The second appellant being the mother of the deceased is entitled to Rs.14,00,000/- with accrued interest. The third appellant is entitled to Rs.6,00,000/- with accrued interest. The second respondent Insurance Company is directed to deposit the entire enhanced amount within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, less the amount already deposited, if any. On such deposit being made, the appellants/claimants are entitled to withdraw their respective shares as apportioned by this Court by filing necessary application before the Tribunal. The appellants/Claimants are 2/3

directed to pay necessary court fee for the enhanced amount.

5. Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction and issue fresh order copy to the parties.

[N.A.V.,J.] [K.K.R.K.,J.] 22.04.2026 Indu 3/3